Interpersonal
Communication
Gudykunst, Ting-Toomey, & Chua (1988), differentiate
cultures on the basis of the variables in communication and
interaction styles predominant within each culture. One of
the variables refers to individualism versus collectivism;
another variable refers to low context versus
high context. The following charts compare U.S.
culture, which is perceived as being predominantly individualistic
and low context, to Cambodian culture, which is perceived
as being predominantly collectivist and high
context.
Comparison of variables in interpersonal communication between
Puerto Rican and U.S. majority cultures (Collectivism
vs. Individualism).
Cambodian
Culture
Collectivism |
American
Majority Culture
Individualism |
|
Extended family:
Parent(s), children, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins,
etc. |
Nuclear family:
Parent(s)and children. |
Loyalty to
the group = “I belong.” |
Loyalty to
one's own goals = “I'm self-sufficient.” |
Group consensus
= “We” |
Personal opinion
= “I” |
Omission of
truth = Harmony |
Omission of
truth = Dishonesty |
Confrontation
is not desirable: It is rude and destructive. |
Confrontation:
It is healthy to give and receive feedback. |
"No”
is substituted for “Well…, maybe…, let's
see…” |
“No” |
Group identity
is emphasized. |
Identity based
on individual characteristics. |
Comparison of variables in interpersonal communication between
Cambodian and U.S. majority cultures (High vs. low
context).
Cambodian
Culture
High context |
American
Majority Culture Low context |
|
Prefers implicit
language and derives most information from the context
of the communication rather than the actual code used. |
Values are
explicit; language is neutral; derives most information
through the actual code used to communicate. |
Alludes to
shared experiences in communication. |
Avoids allusions
and connotations in communication. |
Employs
ambiguous communication to convey a wide range of emotional
responses. Expects members of the “in” group
to know and follow the appropriate protocol when interacting. |
Prefers precise
language to describe fact, technique or expectation. |
Considers it
inappropriate to discuss an individual's problems in public.
Criticism, if necessary, is done in private and indirectly.
Questioning about the issue, talking around rather than
directly about the issue and allowing the person to deal
with the problem are more likely to elicit a positive
response. |
Considers
it inappropriate to discuss an individual's problems in
public. Criticism can, however, is frequently done in
public. Values direct communication to resolve differences.
|
Hofstede and Bond (1984) also differentiate
cultures on the basis of the variables in communication and
interaction styles predominant within each culture. One of
the variables refers to low power distance versus
high power distance; another variable refers to
masculinity versus femininity. The following charts
compare U.S. majority culture, which is perceived as being
predominantly low power distance and masculine,
to Cambodian culture, which is perceived as being predominantly
high power distance and feminine.
Comparison of variables in interpersonal communication between
Puerto Rican and U.S. majority cultures (High vs.
low power distance).
Cambodian
Culture
High power distance |
American
Majority Culture
Low power distance |
|
Honors
referent powers, and perceives a clear delineation between
superiors and subordinates and between the young and
the old.
Demands obedience in children. |
Honors legitimate
or expert power; considers authority something to be earned. |
Expects teachers
to direct student‘s learning. |
Encourages
independence and active experimentation in children. |
Obedience,
respect and allegiance to superiors or those in power
is considered highly desirable. |
Places a premium
on student initiative and student-oriented educational
process. |
Comparison of variables in interpersonal communication between
Cambodian and U.S. majority cultures (femininity vs.
masculinity)
Cambodian
Culture Femininity |
American
Majority Culture Masculinity |
|
Places higher
value on people, quality of life and nurturing. Meeting
basic needs is considered a sufficient end in itself.
Ambition and competitiveness are not valued traits. Argument
and confrontation are to be avoided. |
Places higher
value on material possessions, power and assertiveness. |
Considers disagreement
impolite and, therefore, may verbalize ‘yes’
but act to the contrary. |
Disagreement
is valued as a means of expressing one’s self. |
Values sparing
a person’s feelings (saving face). Confrontation
or disrespect is avoided. Choosing not to answer a question
is a strategy often employed to avoid verbal disagreement. |
Values the
truth over sparing the feelings of another. Direct confrontation
or verbal disagreement is used when necessary. |
Clearly
delineates sex roles. The father or oldest child is
seen as the head of the family. The mother is often
perceived as a subordinate figure.
Due to decades of war and civil unrest, the male population
has been drastically reduced and women are assuming
roles that were previously reserved for men. |
Clearly delineates
sex roles. |
Possesses strong
concern for social harmony and human relationships. |
Has strong
motivation for achievement, and considers work central
to life. |
|