Assessment of
Khmer Language Students in the US Schools
ELLs’ ‘errors’
or miscues in speaking, reading or writing, which can be explained
by their primary language’s influence on English, are
to be expected. These miscues are developmental, and they
do not constitute a learning problem or (dis)ability. They
are an indication of a natural phenomenon of linguistic transference
from the primary to the second or the new language.
Serpa (2000)
In classroom assessment of Khmer speakers, educators need
to become familiar with the main characteristics of the Khmer
language and its influences on students learning to understand,
speak, read and write in English as a new language. This is
essential in order to better understand these students’
funds of knowledge and to better distinguish between linguistic
differences and specific learning disabilities (Wilson-Portuondo,
2004).
When you are faced with the question: “Are the errors
or miscues in reading or writing the result of a linguistic
influence or are they an indication of a learning disability?”
The first step is to ask yourself:
- What do I already know about linguistically and culturally
responsive assessment?
- What essential questions do I have about my ELL’s
language and cultural needs?
- What knowledge do I need to seek that will support my
effectiveness as a teacher/assessor of these students?
To begin to explore the answer to some of these questions,
you are invited to link to the STARTING
POINT before initiating a referral or any eligibility
assessment of an ELL at (beginning, intermediate or
advanced) levels of English proficiency.
Before any valid interpretation of the assessment data collected
on a Khmer-speaking student, you need to have acquired the
essential linguistic and cultural knowledge factors such as:
Linguistic Factors
General
-
the main characteristics of English
(Fillmore & Snow, 2000)
-
the stages of second language
acquisition and the levels of English
-
the difference between fluency and proficiency (BICS
& CALP) (Cummins, 2003)
-
factors that influence second language
acquisition
Language Specific
- the main characteristics
of Khmer and how these differ from those of English
- how the home language contributes to the Khmer student’s
learning to understand, speak, read and write in English
as a new language
- similarities and differences between expected second language
acquisition behaviors and learning disabilities indicators
Cultural Factors
General
- cultural diversity pedagogy
- level of acculturation
of the student
Student Specific
- student’s family cultural
background (e.g. values, beliefs, child-rearing practices
and behaviors) and how similar or how different it is from
U. S. majority culture.
- influence of culture on assessment, learning and motivation
To be able to explore the distinction between linguistic
differences and learning disabilities, many educators need
to enrich their professional knowledge with an upgrade in
diversity education, which focuses on cultural and linguistically
specific information (Wilson-Portuondo, 2004).
|